|
Health Insurance Costs Expected To Rise
by Michele Valenzuela » Tuesday, August 24, 2010 10:14 AM
Health Insurance Costs Expected To Rise Sharply In 2011.
Writing for CBS MoneyWatch.com (8/24), Carla Fried says, "Well, there's one area where deflation will definitely not be at play in 2011: health insurance. A survey of large businesses reports that employers expect their healthcare insurance costs to rise by an average of 8.9 percent in 2011. And to help cover those rising health insurance costs, more than six out of 10 employers also expect to raise their employees' share of the premium cost." Fried adds that it is "likely many Americans are going to see any bump in their compensation eaten up by having to pay more for health insurance." Fried notes, "According to the National Business Group on Health survey...out-pocket maximums and bigger in-network deductibles are the next two 'most popular' options employers will enlist to share the pain of rising insurance coverage."
|
MLR Regulations
by Michele Valenzuela » Tuesday, August 24, 2010 10:13 AM
Top Dems, NAIC Could Pressure Sebelius On MLR Regulations.
Politico (8/24, Haberkorn) reports that HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius "could find herself pitted between top Democrats on Capitol Hill and state insurance commissioners over a key section of the healthcare overhaul. Sebelius is waiting for the National Association of Insurance Commissioners to suggest rules surrounding how much insurance companies must spend on medical costs versus administrative expenses or profits," but the "report, expected in weeks, isn't likely to be as strict on insurers as top Democrats have hoped." HHS spokeswoman Jessica Santillo "would not elaborate" on the department's plans, but stated, "We will be issuing a regulation and will be working from NAIC's report." Meanwhile, Sebelius, who previously "served as NAIC president,"...wrote that "the series of Medical Loss Ratio regulations will simply 'build on the NAIC recommendations.'"
|
Health Reform Requirements
by Michele Valenzuela » Tuesday, August 24, 2010 10:12 AM
Health Reform Requirements Could Alter Role Of Insurance Brokers, Agents.
The Richmond (VA) Times-Dispatch (8/24, Smith) reports, "Health-care reform will change the insurance landscape for consumers, but it also will change it for insurance brokers and agents who earn a living helping people choose plans." The new healthcare "law requires states to set up health insurance exchanges that consumers can go to and shop for a health plan. It also requires that exchanges provide 'navigators' that do outreach and help people understand options," but the "role of these navigators and how brokers and agents will be paid have created uncertainty for agents."
|
Humana - Drug Updates
by Michele Valenzuela » Monday, August 23, 2010 4:27 PM
Regarding » Humana
Drug List updates from Humana Pharmacy Solutions
August 13, 2010
Each year Humana’s Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee reviews and updates the Drug List to ensure drugs are placed in the most appropriate and cost effective level. Changes are implemented to:
- Help ensure safety
- Control cost
- Mitigate pharmacy trend
Changes will be effective January 1, 2011. Humana will send specific details to agents by mail in late August and will contact employers and members starting in September.
|
Humana - Vision benefits positive impact
by Michele Valenzuela » Monday, August 23, 2010 4:25 PM
Regarding » Humana
Vision benefits can have a positive impact on employee’s health and workplace productivity
August 13, 2010
Vision benefits can have a positive impact on employee’s health and workplace productivity
Keeping employees healthy means fewer sick days and higher productivity. For example, uncorrected vision problems cost businesses an estimated $8 billion in lost productivity each year according to The Vision Council.
Annual eye examinations not only help promote vision health, but doctors can catch major health issues too. Many diseases - diabetes, hypertension, multiple sclerosis, high blood pressure, osteoporosis, and rheumatoid arthritis - can be diagnosed by looking into the eyes.
Your clients can offer a Humana vision plan on an employer-sponsored, administrative-services only, or voluntary basis. Voluntary simply means the benefits are 100 percent employee paid and there is no cost to their benefits budget.
Here are a few advantages to choosing a Humana vision plan:
- Members have access to large, national networks
- Discounts on LASIK and PRK procedures
- Benefits encourage prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment
- Genuine, friendly service and prompt answers to questions
|
Health Reform Weekly
by Michele Valenzuela » Friday, August 20, 2010 12:20 PM
Regarding » Aetna
While a number of the new health care reform law's provisions will take effect in less than six weeks, several polls in recent weeks make it clear that many Americans remain confused about just what the complex law will and will not do. Some Americans continue to erroneously believe the law will create death panels making end-of-life decisions. Others are unaware that September 23 will bring new benefits under the law, such as dependent coverage to age 26, tax credits for small businesses, broad preventive service coverage and high-risk coverage. As a result, a number of organizations are ramping up efforts to educate consumers about the impact of the law. Aetna has made available information online that helps explain the impact of certain provisions, as well as the challenges that remain because of the law's failure to adequately address cost and quality issues
|
Implementation Of Healthcare Law
by Michele Valenzuela » Friday, August 20, 2010 12:19 PM
Federal Government Will Ensure Implementation Of Healthcare Law.
The Financial Times (8/19, Fifield, subscription required) reports that the Obama Administration plans to make sure that each state implements the healthcare law. According to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, "The way the bill is written, it really is a state-based program with the federal government providing the back-up. ... So if a state opts not to set up a risk pool, we do it here at the department. If the state opts not to regulate their insurance market, we do it." Sebelius also said that implementation of the law would occur in spite of any delays, adding, "The legal challenges will work their way through...It doesn't slow anything down. This is the law of the land."
|
Businesses Plan To Raise Employee Health Premiums
by Michele Valenzuela » Friday, August 20, 2010 12:18 PM
More Big Businesses Plan To Raise Employee Health Premiums.
The Hill's (8/18, Lillis) "Healthwatch" blog reported that "faced with skyrocketing healthcare costs and new insurance rules under healthcare reform, more of the nation's biggest businesses are planning to hike premiums and cost-sharing measures on their employees next year," according to a survey of those companies released Wednesday. "Seventy percent of large employers said they will eliminate lifetime dollar caps on overall benefits," according to the latest annual survey conducted by the National Business Group on Health, "while 63 percent plan to increase premium rates in 2011, up from 57 percent this year." The findings were based on responses "from 72 large employers representing more than 3.7 million employees," NBGH said.
|
Reform Has Not Improved Americans' Confidence
by Michele Valenzuela » Friday, August 20, 2010 12:17 PM
Reform Has Not Improved Americans' Confidence In Healthcare System.
The AP (8/19, Alonso-Zaldivar, Tompson) reports, "President Barack Obama's health overhaul hasn't helped Americans feel any more secure about their own medical care, according to a survey to be released Thursday by leading private researchers." Notably, the "Robert Wood Johnson Foundation said consumer confidence spiked in April after Obama signed landmark legislation to expand coverage and start trying to control costs," yet "confidence levels have since fallen back to what they were last year at the beginning of an epic congressional debate." The AP adds, "It's another sign of ambivalence over Obama's historic accomplishment as Democrats campaign to preserve their congressional majorities in the midterm elections."
|
Humana - Dueling opinions
by Michele Valenzuela » Thursday, August 12, 2010 4:54 PM
Regarding » Humana
A federal judge in Virginia hasn't yet decided on the constitutionality of the health reform law's requirement that every individual buy insurance. But he refused to dismiss Virginia's lawsuit in opposition to the mandate, which the Obama administration had asked him to do.
In a 32-page opinion, Judge Henry Hudson wrote that the case "raises a host of complex constitutional issues" – including whether the government has the authority to regulate "a person's decision not to purchase a product."
"Unquestionably," he wrote, "this regulation radically changes the landscape of health insurance coverage in America. Never before has the Commerce Clause... been extended this far."
Virginia is one of 21 states fighting the health care law. In reaction to Judge Hudson's ruling, Randy Barnett of Georgetown University's law school told the New York Times, "This decision establishes the seriousness of the constitutional challenges to the individual mandate." A Yale Law School professor, Jack Balkin, said, "It is still very likely that the Supreme Court will uphold the individual mandate," if the case gets that far.
This case is not likely to be settled soon or by one court, as Judge Hudson recognized in his opinion. He wrote, "While this court's decision may set the initial judicial course of the case, it will certainly not be the final word."
|
Humana - Dueling Voters
by Michele Valenzuela » Thursday, August 12, 2010 4:52 PM
Regarding » Humana
Dueling voters
Last week, 71 percent of Missouri voters approved Proposition C – a controversial ballot measure to prohibit the state from requiring people to have health insurance. The vote was mostly considered symbolic, since federal law usually trumps state law. But it was thought to be important for other reasons. First, it is being interpreted as evidence of general discontent with Washington, Democratic leaders and health reform. And, second, those who oppose the health reform law were much more energized to get out and vote than those who favor it (only 23 percent of registered voters voted).
Republican National Committee chairman Michael Steele said, "Missouri sent a clear message to Democrats and the Obama administration that government-run health care is a gross overreach of the federal government that needs to be repealed and replaced."
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid responded, "It's very obvious that people have a lack of understanding of our health care reform bill. The more people learn about this bill, the more they like it... The trend is turning in America today. Once you explain what's in the bill, the American people, of course, like it."
Actually, even the polls don't agree on the subject of health reform. A Kaiser Family Foundation poll found that 50 percent of the people now favor the reform bill, while only 35 percent oppose it. A Pew Research Center poll shows the opposite: that 35 percent approve and 47 percent disapprove.
Several polls have found that senior citizens have little understanding of the law. To build support and understanding, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released a TV ad featuring actor Andy Griffith touting some of the benefits. "This year, like always, we'll have our guaranteed benefits," he promises. "And with the new health care law, more good things are coming: free check ups, lower prescription costs, and better ways to protect us and Medicare from fraud... I think you're going to like it."
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's reaction to the ad was, "It's going to take more than slick taxpayer-funded ads to convince skeptical seniors that cutting a half-trillion dollars from Medicare is good for them." The White House blog defended the ad and the initial $700,000 buy of TV time, saying, "Seniors were the target of a major misinformation campaign."
|
Humana - pre-existing condition exclusions for children
by Michele Valenzuela » Thursday, August 12, 2010 4:51 PM
Regarding » Humana
HHS issues Q/A on pre-existing condition exclusions for children
Health insurers in the individual market can use specific open enrollment periods to enroll children under age 19, according to new information from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
HHS recently posted questions and answers to clarify aspects of the reform law that guarantee coverage for children with pre-existing conditions.
The HHS questions and answers build on interim final regulations issued on June 28, 2010, which prevent insurers from imposing pre-existing condition exclusions on children under 19 for plan years beginning on or after Sept. 23, 2010. In the individual market, those regulations only apply to non-grandfathered individual policies and not to grandfathered plans in place on or before March 23, 2010.
HHS released the new information after several insurers reportedly stopped writing new individual plans for children, citing concerns that parents would wait to buy a policy until their children became sick.
According to HHS, "To address concerns over adverse selection, issuers in the individual market may restrict enrollment of children under 19, whether in family or individual coverage, to specific open enrollment periods if allowed under State law."
HHS also says insurers may "determine the number and length of open enrollment periods for children under 19," but that the administration will continue to watch how insurers use open enrollment periods and will issue further guidance "if it appears their use is limiting access intended under the law."
Read the full HHS Q/A.
|
Aetna - Child-only policy sales discontinuing
by Michele Valenzuela » Thursday, August 12, 2010 8:46 AM
Regarding » Aetna
For 10/1/10 and later effective dates, Aetna will discontinue new business sales of our child-only policies to applicants (under the age of 19) for our Aetna Advantage Plans for Individuals, Families and the Self Employed. No existing policyholder is affected by this action.
Effective immediately, any applications received requesting a child-only policy with a 10/1/10 effective date (or later) will be closed. Underwriting will notify applicants by mail of their ineligibility, but also provide options for coverage – see below.
Why are we making this change? This change positions Aetna for the future so we can effectively handle upcoming changes resulting from healthcare reform. New federal rules require guaranteed issue (GI) of coverage for individuals under the age of 19 and no corresponding coverage requirement. These conditions have the potential to significantly increase the cost of premiums and make coverage unaffordable.
No impact to existing child-only policies Existing policyholders will not be impacted by this action and they may continue their current coverage. These policies are renewable
States affected Discontinuation of child-only coverage for the following states AK, AR, AZ, CA, CO, DC, DE, FL, GA, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MI, MO, MS, NC, NE, NV, PA, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV, and WY will occur on 10/1/10. The implementation date for the following states CT, MD, OH, and OK is still being established. We will notify you once dates are confirmed for these states.
Other health insurance options available for individuals under age 19
- Be added as a dependent to a parent's plan.
- If the above option is not a viable solution, applicants can check www.healthcare.gov for alternatives
Aetna continues to explore options with states where we are ceasing the sales of new child-only policies, including reviewing other regulatory changes that may allow us to re-enter this market and provide a valuable product between now and 2014.
The field underwriting guide for all states will be updated in Producer World by Friday, August 20th.
|
Missouri Residents Vote Against Mandate In Healthcare Law
by Michele Valenzuela » Wednesday, August 04, 2010 3:40 PM
The New York Times (8/4, A11, Davey) reports, "Missouri voters on Tuesday easily approved a measure aimed at nullifying the new federal healthcare law, becoming the first state in the nation where ordinary people made known their dismay over the issue at the ballot box." Notably, the "measure was intended to invalidate a crucial element of President Obama's healthcare law - namely, that most people be required to get health insurance or pay a tax penalty. Supporters of the measure said it would send a firm signal to Washington about how this state, often a bellwether in presidential elections, felt about such a law."
The AP (8/4, Lieb) notes that, "with about 70 percent of the vote counted late Tuesday, nearly three-quarters of voters threw their support behind a ballot measure, Proposition C, that would prohibit the government from requiring people to have health insurance or from penalizing them for not having it." The measure "would conflict with a federal requirement that most people have health insurance or face penalties starting in 2014."
Nevertheless, the Wall Street Journal (8/4, Landers, subscription required) says that this vote will most likely have little impact immediately since the mandate provision in the healthcare law is not slated to take effect until 2014. Reuters (8/4, Gillam) also covers the story.
Commentary: States' Challenge Of Healthcare Law Politically Motivated. Ann Woolner writes in a Bloomberg News (8/4) commentary, "Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, speaking of a case aimed at stopping national health-care reform, declared, 'This lawsuit is not about health care. It's about our freedom.'" Other lawmakers have made similar comments, but Woolner says that they are "wrong," that the case is "about politics. It's so obviously about politics that most folks take that fact for granted." She adds, "These cases are another way for Republicans to try to defeat a Democratic initiative and score points while doing it. Whether you think the lawsuits are worthy probably depends more on your political views than on your constitutional interpretation."
|
Healthcare Law To Take Effect In September
by Michele Valenzuela » Wednesday, August 04, 2010 3:37 PM
The AP (8/4, Murphy) reports, "Healthcare reform hits another milestone next month, with new provisions that include a coverage expansion for young adults and restrictions on an insurer's ability to impose annual coverage limits or to reject children with pre-existing medical conditions." The AP adds, "Insurance coverage that starts on or after Sept. 23 will have to comply with these changes and others that were put in place when President Barack Obama signed the health overhaul into law March 23." But, "for most people, the changes won't affect their plans until coverage renews in the weeks or months that follow."
|
Humana - Small business tax credits
by Michele Valenzuela » Tuesday, August 03, 2010 11:41 AM
Regarding » Humana
Beginning in 2010, small businesses with fewer than 25 employees and average wages of less than $50,000 get a tax credit for their contributions to buying health insurance for employees. The tax credit starts at up to 35 percent and increases to 50 percent in 2014 when the exchange is operational. A full tax credit may be available to small businesses with fewer than 10 employees and average wages of less than $25,000.
|
Humana - eBilling Available in August
by Michele Valenzuela » Tuesday, August 03, 2010 11:39 AM
Regarding » Humana
Your Humana online billing experience just got a lot better with the creation of eBilling.
With eBilling you’ll have many of the capabilities you’re currently using along with some exciting new features, which includes payment and online termination options.
|
HHS Clarifies Rules About Children's Health Coverage
by Michele Valenzuela » Thursday, July 29, 2010 3:50 PM
The health insurance industry has won a concession from the Obama administration on insurance coverage for children." HHS "said Wednesday that insurers can set limited sign-up periods for a new kind of guaranteed coverage that is available to children regardless of medical problems."
CQ HealthBeat (7/29, Reichard, subscription required) reports that HHS "issued a clarification...of its rules requiring insurers in the individual market to accept children with pre-existing medical conditions, saying" on its website, "To address concerns over adverse selection, issuers in the individual market may restrict enrollment of children under 19, whether in family or individual coverage, to specific open enrollment periods if allowed under State law." CQ notes that the clarification "follows comments last week by some state insurance commissioners that insurers were dropping kids-only coverage because of worries about 'adverse selection.'"
BCBS Of Florida To Resume Sales Of "Child-Only Policies" Following HHS Clarification. The Hill (7/29, Pecquet) reports in its Healthwatch blog, "Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida intends to resume the sale of new child-only policies after the Obama administration issued new regulatory guidance...according to the White House." The Hill adds, "In a post on the White House blog, Office of Health Reform Director Nancy-Ann DeParle" wrote "that the company has stated it is 'pleased to announce that it will establish a process to resume the sale of Child Only policies.'" Notably, several "health plans across the country had warned they would stop issuing new coverage because of concerns that a healthcare reform provision barring them from discriminating against sick children could encourage parents to wait until their children are sick before enrolling them."
|
Determining What Qualifies as Medical Loss Ratio
by Michele Valenzuela » Wednesday, July 28, 2010 5:00 PM
There was good news last week for those who are concerned that the medical loss ratio provision (MLR) of the new federal health care reform law could seriously harm quality improvement programs and member counseling programs. The law requires health insurers to spend at least 80 percent of premium revenue on medical claims in the individual and small group markets and 85 percent in the large group markets. But exactly what qualifies as medical costs is still an open question. Representatives of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, which is developing a recommendation for the federal government on what should be counted, indicated last week that they are inclined to allow some quality-improvement programs to be considered medical costs. This comes as good news for employers and consumers. Aetna has actively argued that narrow MLR definitions could lead to the elimination or reduction of valuable care review programs, increase health care costs overall and employer premiums, and threaten the solvency of some insurers or force them to leave certain markets.
|
Aetna products now available on Healthcare.gov web portal
by Michele Valenzuela » Wednesday, July 28, 2010 4:56 PM
Regarding » Aetna
|
As part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) unveiled Healthcare.gov July 1. The new website provides individuals and small businesses health insurance coverage options in 50 states and the District of Columbia. |
|
New Web portal HealthCare.gov is a central database of health coverage options, combining information about public programs with information from private carriers. It displays plan options available for consumers, life situations and local communities.
Within the site's Find Insurance Options tab, consumers enter their demographic details, household characteristics and dependencies, health condition, reason for requiring health benefits, disability status, zip code, and if they are an individual or small business employer. The portal then processes and responds with zip-code specific plan design options available from public programs and private carriers.
It also provides five categories of plan details: services covered, doctor locator, drug benefits, price estimates, and a phone number and website to contact the plan carrier. Additionally, the website serves as a one-stop informational tool as HHS implements the Affordable Care Act. While the July 1 launch was an initial release, additional plan information will be added by October 1, 2010.
Further updates by HHS will be applied as necessary. Visit http://www.healthcare.gov/improve.html for questions related to the future growth of the new www.Healthcare.gov site. |
|
Humana - Open Enrollment Changes
by Michele Valenzuela » Monday, July 26, 2010 9:58 AM
Regarding » Humana
Changes to open enrollment processes for Small Business
Humana is implementing changes* to its eligibility and enrollment processes. These changes are intended to align the open enrollment time frames between our commercial small group products, wherever possible and applicable. In doing so, the overall enrollment experience is made easier for our customers.
In addition, this process will be incorporated into the benefit plan document provisions for our Preferred Provider Organization products (which is similar to our National Point of Service and Health Maintenance Organization products).
*Enrollment process changes excludes the following states: CA, CO, IL, KS, MO, TN, NV, VA & UT
Overview:
Open enrollment is a period of time occurring annually, during which employees will be given the opportunity to enroll themselves and their eligible dependents for coverage under the employer group policy.
The below illustrates how Humana will align its small business commercial products. Small business is defined as companies with up to 99 employees:
- Medical products: All Humana medical products, which will now include PPO products, will be subject to this open enrollment process. The open enrollment period will be thirty-one (31) days before and after the employer group's renewal date.
- Dental** & Vision products: The open enrollment period will now be thirty-one (31) days before and after the employer group's renewal date and is similar to the medical open enrollment period. You will continue to have the ability to change the open enrollment period, should your client request to alter the open enrollment time period.
Open enrollment will have an impact on individuals who enroll late for their employer's group coverage. In general, an employee or dependent that enrolls for coverage more than 31 days after their eligibility date (or after group's renewal date) will be considered a late applicant under this new open enrollment process.
A late applicant will not be added to the employer group policy at the time of application and will instead be required to wait until the group's next open enrollment period to enroll. If a late applicant attempts to enroll:
- The enrollment will be postponed because the applicant did not meet plan eligibility standards;
- An identification card(s) will not be issued;
- A letter will be sent informing the applicant that their enrollment was postponed based on the plan eligibility standards and informing the applicant to enroll at the group's next open enrollment period. The employer will receive a carbon copy of this letter.
The open enrollment provisions will go in effect as of:
- New business groups effective August 1, 2010 or later
- Existing business groups with renewal dates on or after November 1, 2010
Note: existing business groups will be notified of this material change to their policy prior to their renewal date.
|
|